See ECB (2025), Update on the work of the digital euro scheme’s Rulebook Development Group, 30 October.
During the preparation phase, further progress was made on the draft rulebook, building on the feedback received from the RDG members and their constituencies. This feedback came from a consultation with the RDG on the first interim draft in early 2024, which generated around 2,000 unique comments. The draft rulebook was also further developed in areas not yet or only partially covered initially. This was achieved through the support provided by various RDG workstreams, involving around 50 participants from over 30 organisations, which helped develop areas such as implementation specifications.
See ECB (2025), ECB selects digital euro service providers, 2 October.
See ECB (2025), Digital euro innovation platform - outcome report: pioneers and visionaries workstreams, 26 September.
Conditional payments are payments triggered when specific conditions are met. One example would be a payment that is automatically released to a merchant once goods have been delivered and confirmed by the buyer.
See Ipsos (2025), Digital euro user research report, 30 October.
See ECB (2025), Fit of the digital euro in the payment ecosystem report, 30 October.
See Euro Summit, 20 March 2025.
See Euro Summit, 23 October 2025.
See meeting of the Eurogroup, 19 September 2025.
See ECB (2025), “Technical data on the financial stability impact of the digital euro”, October.
See ECB (2025), “A view on recent assessments of digital euro investment costs for the euro area banking sector”, October.
See ECB (2024), Study on the payment attitudes of consumers in the euro area (SPACE).
See ECB (2024), Use of cash by companies in the euro area in 2024.
See ECB (2023), A stocktake on the digital euro (October 2023).
Statement from the Euro Summit, 20 March 2025: “In a more fragmented and digital world, accelerating progress on a digital euro is key to support a competitive and resilient European payment system, contribute to Europe’s economic security and strengthen the international role of the euro. We invite the President of the Eurogroup to report regularly on progress with these initiatives.”
See 2025 State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen, 10 September 2025.
Dispute management covers the rules and mechanisms for resolving disputes between scheme participants and, ultimately, end users.
“EU National” means any legal entity with registered offices in an EU member state or any natural person that has the nationality of an EU member state. “Control” means the ability to exercise a decisive influence on an undertaking, directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediate undertakings. Control can take any of the following forms: (i) the direct or indirect holding of more than 50% of the nominal value of the issued share capital in the legal entity concerned, or of a majority of the voting rights of the shareholders or associates of that entity; (ii) the direct or indirect holding, in fact or in law, of decision-making powers in the legal entity concerned.
See theDecisions taken by the Governing Council of the ECB (in addition to decisions setting interest rates) from July 2025.
External development costs until a first issuance are estimated at around €265 million.
See Call for expressions of interest in innovation partnerships for the digital euro.
Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) are not eligible for offline payments, as they offer a lower level of security compared with other solutions. While a TEE is a secure area of a device’s main processor for protecting sensitive data, it is still vulnerable to physical attacks (such as tampering or extraction).
An embedded secure element is a tamper-resistant chip built directly into a device to securely store and manage sensitive data such as payment information or digital keys.
An eSIM (embedded SIM) is a built-in chip within devices that enables users to seamlessly switch between mobile network operators remotely, without the need to physically replace the SIM card.
Specifically, they are capable of achieving a security level equivalent to the Common Criteria AVA_VAN.5 rating, a globally recognised benchmark for vulnerability assessment and resistance against sophisticated attacks.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1).
User mapping refers to the process that a PSP uses to associate users with their financial accounts, transactions, or holdings. It acts as the bridge that links an individual (the user) to their corresponding financial data, such as their balance or transaction history.
The reservation of funds functionality includes, but is not limited to, creating, retrieving, updating and managing reservations in line with the Eurosystem’s privacy-by-design principle. Such functionality would also enable reserved amounts to be adjusted or expiry dates to be extended (e.g. if an end user stays longer in a hotel than originally planned), with automatic funding triggered to cover shortfalls where necessary.
See ECB (2025), “Digital euro innovation platform outcome report: pioneers and visionaries workstreams”.
Conditional payments are payments triggered automatically once conditions are met. For example, releasing funds to a payee only upon confirmation of delivery of a given product or service, or applying an automatic best-fare calculation for public transport.
This split of responsibilities is similar to a frequently used split where the settlement layer would enable the settlement, also providing advanced functionalities to ensure certainty of payments, whereas a second layer would cover the implementation of conditionalities.
Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 70).
In any case, users would have the option to link their digital euro wallet with a commercial bank account, allowing them to make payments through their digital euro wallet without needing to pre-load it with funds. This set-up would enable large payments to be made with digital euro, irrespective of the digital wallet’s current balance. In addition, this functionality would permit the receipt of payments exceeding the set holding limit.
These three objectives naturally lead to a trade-off: the holding limit should be set sufficiently high to avoid impairing users’ ability to use the digital euro as a convenient means of payment and to preserve the role of central bank money in the future, yet not so high as to jeopardise the stability of the financial system or smooth monetary policy implementation and transmission. In addressing all three objectives simultaneously, the methodology adheres to the principle of proportionality, as enshrined in Article 5(4) of the Treaty on European Union and explicitly referenced in Recital 32 of the draft Regulation on the establishment of the digital euro. Pursuant to this principle, restrictions in EU legislation on the "store of value" function of public money (one of the three key functions of money) should be necessary, appropriate and the least intrusive measure required to achieve the objectives of the Treaty, including maintaining financial stability and supporting the effectiveness of monetary policy. Similarly, limitations on individuals’ freedom to hold significant amounts of digital euro (a freedom that is considered unrestricted for cash) should be proportionate to these objectives.
Market stakeholders, through the Euro Retail Payments Board (ERPB), received an update on the methodology (including the technical annex) and were given the possibility to comment on it via a written procedure. See ECB (2024), “Preliminary methodology for calibrating holding limits”, 10 December, and the related “Annex to preliminary methodology for holding limit calibration – agenda item 3”, 12 December. The collected input was then assessed and presented; see ECB (2025), “Summary of feedback on work on methodology for holding limit calibration – agenda item 2”, 11 February.
The digital euro is being designed against the backdrop of digitalisation, which is transforming how people pay and reducing the use of cash. This trend exists independently of the digital euro and must be factored into the calibration of holding limits. Designing adequate and proportionate holding limits requires looking ahead and envisioning how the financial sector may evolve, in order to assess the potential impact of the digital euro on the financial system, not only today but also in the future.
The survey was conducted among 1,000 individuals in each euro area country, with the exception of three countries (Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus) where it was conducted among 500 respondents. Respondents were told that discussions are currently taking place about the possible introduction of a digital euro. After showing respondents basic information explaining what a digital euro would offer, as presented on the ECB’s website, they were asked to state how likely they were to “try out” a digital euro.
The figure 66% represents the share of individuals reporting that they were fairly likely or very likely to use a digital euro among all the individuals reporting that they were fairly/very likely or fairly/very unlikely to use a digital euro (so following exclusion of individuals reporting “Don’t know”, 8%).
The trend is broadly repeated in several surveys conducted by national central banks, suggesting that many Europeans are open to the idea of using a digital euro. See De Nederlandsche Bank (2025), “The offline digital euro and holding limits: a user-centred approach – An online experiment among Dutch consumers”, Occasional Studies, Vol. 25, No 2; Deutsche Bundesbank press release of 4 June 2024 entitled “Bundesbank survey: Widespread acceptance of digital euro among general public”; De Nederlandsche Bank news article of 22 April 2021 entitled “Digital euro appeals to half of the Dutch population”; Banco de España press release of 23 October 2023 entitled “El uso del efectivo y tarjetas se mantiene, mientras aumenta el de dispositivos móviles”; Cupak, A. et al. (2024), “Survey of Potential Users of the Digital Euro: New Evidence from Slovakia”, NBS Occasional Paper, No 2, Národná banka Slovenska, 12 October; and Abramova, S. et al. (2022), “What can CBDC designers learn from asking potential users? Results from a survey of Austrian residents”, Working Papers, No 241, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, July.
Moreover, respondents revealed a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of preference for pre-funding versus activating and using the reverse waterfall. More specifically, just below one-third said they would like to pre-fund their digital euro account, just over one-third said they would like to link their digital euro account to their commercial bank account (i.e. to use the reverse waterfall), while the final one-third said they would be likely to use both options.
Around 28% and 47% respectively stated that their monthly expenses were a very or somewhat important reference point when benchmarking their preferred digital euro holdings.
See ECB (2025), “Technical data on the financial stability impact of the digital euro”, the accompanying letter from Piero Cipollone to Aurore Lalucq, Chair of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON), headed “Technical data on financial stability impact of digital euro and assessment of bank investments costs”, 10 October; and ECB (2025), “Technical data on the financial stability impact of the digital euro - Seminar with the European Parliament’s negotiating team 22 October 2025 on the single currency package”, 22 October.
The business-as-usual scenario represents a situation that is widely expected to prevail, in which users hold digital euro as a means of payment under normal conditions. In contrast, the flight-to-safety scenario represents a hypothetical and highly unlikely situation which assesses the theoretical potential consequences of an extreme tail event for the financial system. In such an event, the impact on the ECB’s monetary policy transmission mechanism would be likely to elicit a policy reaction, which is not factored into the analysis. The assessment also took into account ongoing digitalisation trends, such as the gradual decline in cash use and the shift towards electronic payments, testing holding limits ranging from €500 to €3,000, following the explicit request by co-legislators.
The co-legislators requested that the analysis focus on certain key indicators, including changes in bank deposits (absolute change in sight deposits), core liquidity metrics (liquidity coverage ratio and net stable funding ratio), banking profitability indicators (return on equity and return on assets) and lending dynamics (loan book growth and loan-to-deposit ratio). The analysis, using supervisory data for a sample of 2,025 banks across the euro area (both significant and less significant institutions), aimed to provide technical input to support legislative discussions. Nonetheless, not all the requests (for example, a breakdown of hypothetical holding limits in €250 intervals) could be fully addressed owing to data limitations or because fulfilling certain requests (for example, providing information on market share by asset size in the respective market) could lead to the identification of individual institutions.
On the individual bank-level, with a €3,000 holding limit, only 13 banks, representing 0.3% of total banking sector assets, would reach the 100% LCR level, and only nine of those banks, representing 0.1% of total banking sector assets, would be at risk of depleting their liquidity buffers below the 100% LCR level as they do not retain enough unencumbered eligible non-HQLA collateral to borrow from the central bank through standard monetary policy operations.
Vulnerable consumers were selected based on the vulnerability dimensions defined by the European Commission, which include: (i) having limited ability to maximise one´s well-being; (ii) having difficulty obtaining or assimilating information; (iii) being less able to buy, choose or access suitable products; and (iv) being more susceptible to certain marketing practices.
Small merchants are defined as sole traders or employees in businesses with 1 to 7 employees, operating either physical and/or e-commerce shops. They represent a segment often underserved by complex payment infrastructures.
See ERPB engagement on digital euro fit in the payment ecosystem – synergies, 18 December 2024.
See the update on the work on the methodology for calibrating holding limits – agenda item 3, 12 December 2024.
See ECB (2025), Fit of the digital euro in the payment ecosystem report – Annex, 30 October.
The Eurosystem remains committed to ensuring that all recommendations align with the key policy objectives of a digital euro.
See (2023) European Commission, Single Currency Package.
See meeting of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council, 8 July 2025.
See meeting of the Eurogroup, 19 September 2025.
See Cipollone, P. (2024), “Preserving people’s freedom to use a public means of payment: insights into the digital euro preparation phase”, 14 February; Cipollone, P. (2024), “From dependency to autonomy: the role of a digital euro in the European payment landscape”, 23 September; Cipollone, P. (2025), “Empowering Europe: boosting strategic autonomy through the digital euro”, 8 April; Cipollone, P. (2025), “The digital euro: legal tender in the digital age”, 14 July; and Cipollone, P. (2025), “The digital euro: ensuring resilience and inclusion in digital payments”, 4 September.
See ECB (2025), “A view on recent assessments of digital euro investment costs for the euro area banking sector”, October.
See ECB (2025), “Technical data on the financial stability impact of the digital euro”, 10 October; and ECB (2025), “Technical data on the financial stability impact of the digital euro - Seminar with the European Parliament’s negotiating team 22 October 2025 on the single currency package”, 22 October.
European Commission (2023), “Commission staff working document impact assessment report”.
The co-legislators requested that analysis focus on certain key indicators, including changes in bank deposits (absolute change in sight deposits), core liquidity metrics (liquidity coverage ratio and net stable funding ratio), banking profitability (return on equity and return on assets) and lending dynamics (loan book growth and loan-to-deposit ratio).
See “Special Issue: Call for Proposals on the Future of Payments – CBDC, Digital Assets and Digital Capital Markets” on the European Finance Association’s website.
See ECB (2025), Civil Society Seminar: Digital euro – ensuring European autonomy and resilience, 16 July; ECB (2024), “Civil Society Seminar: Digital euro – maintaining the freedom to choose how we pay”, 13 November; and ECB (2024), “Civil Society Seminar: Laying the basis for a digital euro”, 8 July.